Sustainability Reporting

A dedicated tool that supports the company through the entire reporting journey: from choosing the standard to double materiality, from data collection to generating the final report. Compared to shared spreadsheets or one-off consulting, it avoids fragmented, unmapped data, ensuring traceability and compliance with CSRD, GRI or VSME.

ESRS is the mandatory standard for companies subject to the CSRD and follows the EFRAG framework; GRI is a voluntary standard, often already adopted by organisations with an established reporting history; VSME is the simplified voluntary standard designed for micro, small and medium enterprises. Green Future Project's software lets you select the standard from the very start of the process, so data collection and report structure adapt accordingly.

The software is available in two modes. 'Software only': you purchase it and manage it independently, with your team following every phase directly, from double materiality to data collection and the final report. 'Hybrid': you purchase the software and pair it with support from Green Future Project's experts across every phase of data collection and structuring, with the platform always available as a repository and usable independently whenever you prefer. You can switch between modes at any time.

It's the starting point of every ESRS report: it assesses both the company's impact on people and the environment (impact materiality) and the financial risks and opportunities tied to ESG topics (financial materiality). Green Future Project's Double Materiality Assessment module guides the company from the impact assessment to the financial one, all the way to the final matrix, exportable as PDF for communication or as Excel with the full detail of scores for each IRO.

It isn't mandatory for VSME, which offers SMEs a leaner reporting framework than ESRS. It remains a useful exercise, however, to identify the topics most relevant to the company before starting data collection.

ESG reporting involves multiple business functions — sustainability, legal, HR, operations — and rarely does a single person have access to all the data. Green Future Project's software has three authorisation levels: Process Owner (manages users and validates information in the DMA and Data Entry modules), Preparer (edits data and documentation), and Contributor (limited access to data entry), with no limit on the number of operating users.

Yes. Double materiality is carried out with a bottom-up approach: first for each entity and for the reporting company, then consolidated at group level, with the option to assign custom weights to the parent company regardless of parameters such as headcount or revenue.

Information requirements are broken down by pillar — Environmental, Social, Governance — and for each subtopic the platform shows the number of material items and the completion percentage of qualitative and quantitative data points. A Task Manager centralises the activities to be carried out, while each data point shows applicability, the relevant regulatory reference, and the option to attach supporting documentation.

The Sustainability Reporting module organises the report into sections (Setup & Layout, Introduction, General Disclosures and others), each with its own progress status. You can customise the content — including the letter to stakeholders — before exporting the final document in Word format, with a cover page tailored to the chosen standard.

Yes. Beyond choosing GRI as a standalone reporting standard, a path built on the EFRAG framework can integrate subtopics from other standards within double materiality, ensuring continuity with any GRI reporting already under way.